Institutionalising Agroecology in the “Cathedral of the Green Revolution”

©FAO/Giuseppe Carotenuto. Editorial use only. Copyright ©FAO.

Jordan Treakle

On April 3rd, 2018 standing before a packed plenary hall of over 700 civil society members, government representatives, practitioners, and academics gathered for the 2nd International Symposium on Agroecology, FAO Director General José Graziano da Silva opened a new chapter in the contested trajectory of agroecology in the global policy arena.

Agroecology – from Fringe Player to Centre Stage

©FAO/Giuseppe Carotenuto. Editorial use only. Copyright ©FAO.

For years the organic farming movement, peasants and civil society organisations have pushed for greater recognition of agroecology as an alternative to the well-recognised failures of the Green Revolution, providing an approach for holistically strengthening ecological resilience in agri-food systems and strengthening the agrarian and rural livelihoods.

Now with agroecology to the top of the policy agenda in FAO, as well as the Committee on World Food Security, the political stakes couldn’t be higher. As agroecology continues to move toward deeper institutionalisation in development organisations like FAO, new policy spaces are emerging for challenging the increasing concentration and corporate control of agri-food systems. At the same time, this institutionalisation risks cooption and the watering down of agroecological principles in these very same, highly politicised, policy spaces.[1]

It was in this context that the FAO Director General opened the Symposium with the unusual announcement that the event would result in a Declaration on how agroecology can be better supported and scaled-up globally. This declaration was to be presented to FAO member States at two high-profile meetings in the coming year. In setting the political stage, the Symposium launched into three days of panel presentations, debates, and negotiations among stakeholders from across the globe on the policy future of agroecology in FAO.

Three Core Themes

Over the course of the Symposium, three core themes emerged, which fundamentally framed the debate, and the final Declaration of the event:

  • An alternative socio-ecological system of production and livelihoods, not a technical fix

A number peasant organisations, including the European Coordination Via Campesina, emphasised that agroecology is not a set of tools or practices than can be used to make large-scale and capital-intensive agriculture systems more sustainable. Rather agroecology is a radical paradigm shift in the social, ecological, and economic practices and relationships surrounding agri-food systems. In this vein, agroecology was shown to be strongly rooted in the livelihoods and environmental characteristics of a particular territory. Put more simply, there is no template for agroecology, but rather it is shaped by the socio-ecological context. Scaling-up this more systemic approach requires a restructuring of how we govern agri-food systems, as our current public policies are consistently failing to account for wide-spread degradation of land and water resources, infringement on the rights of indigenous peoples and rural communities, and on food insecurity and malnutrition. As part of this discussion, particular attention was focused on how public policy could be used to limit profit-seeking behavior in agricultural markets, while better valuing the socio-economic benefits of employment generated by small-scale family farming.

  • Addressing power imbalances in agri-food systems

A second core theme, highlighted by local officials and politicians from Uruguay and India, related to how socio-economic power is wielded to shape agri-food systems. It is no secret that policy formulation is rarely a transparent process, and influential actors often have disproportionate leverage is shaping how public policies can incentivise unsustainable practices or favor powerful business interests. These kinds of power dynamics become glaringly apparent particularly when examining the role of women in agriculture. As emphasized by Ms Isabel Andreoni of Montevideo Rural, in many contexts women bare the majority of labor-intensive responsibilities but are often systematically barred from owning land, gaining formal access to credit, or holding leadership positions in political spaces. Agroecology thus attempts to confront these power asymmetries through collective action, women’s self-empowerment, and policy reform at local, national and global levels. Toward this goal, a number of panelists spoke to the importance of scaling-up open-source information systems for small-scale farmers, strengthening the participation of often marginalised communities (such as pastoralists) in policy-making forums, and demanding equal representation of women in leadership positions of rural institutions.

  • Reconsidering the role of research and knowledge

A final recurring theme of the Symposium focused on the role of research and information systems in demonstrating the benefits of agroecology at a macro-level, as well as overcoming challenges in integrating different kinds of agricultural knowledge with farmers at the field level. Several well-recognised academics such as Dr. Miguel Altieri from UC Berkeley in the United States and Stephen Sherwood from Wageningen University in the Netherlands spoke to the several decades’ worth of science-based research showing the socio-ecological benefits of agroecology production systems. Meanwhile, indigenous and community leaders from Asia and Africa also emphasised the importance of recognising local knowledge systems, which can most effectively identify sustainable production thresholds and reciprocal agricultural practices that support ecological resilience. Thus a main point from this discussion highlighted the fact that local knowledge systems are essential for maintaining agroecological production, and therefore participatory research methodologies are needed to fully understand the range of benefits of these production systems and then effectively translate those findings into policy spheres.

Towards a Declaration?

The event concluded with an extended Symposium Chair’s Summary, which was shaped by voluntary input from those attending the Symposium[2], and was indicated would form the basis of the Declaration to be presented to FAO’s governing bodies. Of note were five areas of “Key Actions for Scaling up Agroecology” listed below:

  • Strengthen the central role of family farmers and their organizations in safeguarding, utilizing, and accessing natural resources
  • Foster experience and knowledge sharing, collaborative research, and innovations
  • Promote markets for agroecological-based products for health, nutrition, and sustainability
  • Review institutional, policy, legal, and financial frameworks to promote agroecological transitions for sustainable food systems
  • Take agroecology to scale through integrated and participatory territorial processes

How does this all relate to the European Context?

In considering how these “Key Actions for Scaling up Agroecology” could impact agri-food systems in Europe, three issues in-particular are strongly linked to agroecology:

Land Concentration

©FAO/Giuseppe Carotenuto. Editorial use only. Copyright ©FAO.

The first is increasing land concentration in Europe, which is particularly impacting mid-scale farms, as well as challenging new and young farmers from entering the sector. In order for agroecology to flourish in Europe, a priority point emphasised by Ms. Katalin Tóth of the Ministry of Agriculture of Hungary, increasing access to land for small and mid-scale producers will have to be addressed through policy reform. This is both a growing problem (see AR 2020’s dedicated landgrabbing section)  and one some MEPs have started to grapple with.

Inter-generational transfer

Secondly, the vast majority of Europe’s farmers will be aging out of the agriculture sector in the coming decade. How we will preserve the local knowledge and agricultural practices of this farming generation and transfer it to the next is a critical and open question. Failure to support farm continuity within the family farming sector, and failure to introduce policy changes which could encourage greater entry by young people willing to farm, risks further concentrating agri-food systems in Europe. (In this context, it is noteworthy that even the typically conservative Ag Committee report, delivered by centre-right MEP Herbert Dorfman  of the EPP, warned that the basic payment structure of the CAP was preventing young people from entering farming.)  

CAP it

 French Ag Minister Stéphane Travert (foreground) and FAO Director General José Graziano da Silva (Background) ©FAO/Giuseppe Carotenuto. Editorial use only. Copyright ©FAO.

Finally, the current reform of the E.U.’s Common Agriculture Policy offers an important opportunity to promote more multi-sectoral agri-food policies incentivising agroecological practices, family farming, and rights-based participatory natural resource governance. As highlighted by Stéphane Travert of the French Ministry for Agriculture, Agrifood and Forestry, agroecology should be a core component of the future Common Agriculture Policy, as a key regulatory framework for rural livelihoods, consumer health, environmental integrity, and European prosperity. And there are some tentative signs that this is happening in his native France, with pesticide restrictions, (some more successful than others) supposed (but poorly organised) agroecological planning by sector, agroecology organisations being set up though whether it is so important for him as his predecessor remains to be seen. And whether these initiatives impact business-as-usual is also questionable. (see ARC2020’s comprehensive CAP news section)

Thus with these insights, it is clear that the further institutionalisation of agroecology in FAO’s “Cathedral of the Green Revolution,” as named by the FAO Director General during the First International Agroecology Symposium in 2014, casts an uncharted, but certainly contested, policy future for agroecology. It’s up to agroecologically-orientated farmer organisations and social movements to keep pressure on policy makers to embed this promising approach.

[1] Giraldo and Rosset 2017. Agroecology as a territory in dispute: between institutionality and social movements.

[2] For the statement by small-scale food producers and civil society organizations on the Symposium Chair Summary, see here.

Jordan Treakle is an international consultant and independent researcher working in areas of agriculture and land policy, rights-based territorial development, and sustainable food systems. His academic background is in rural sociology, having completed a MSc. in International Rural Development in the Rural Sociology Group of Wageningen University (The Netherlands). Jordan is currently based in Rome, Italy.

 

More on Agroecology

2nd UN FAO Agroecology Symposium Targets SDGs

Digital Revolution in Agriculture: Fitting for Agroecology?

Agroecology | A Tale of Two Continents

Meet Olga Alcaraz | Gender Equality in Mexican Agroecology

1st Forum of Agroecology Europe – a Solid Basis for a European-Wide Movement

 

Jordan Treakle
About Jordan Treakle 1 Article
Jordan is an international consultant and independent researcher working in areas of agriculture and land policy, rights-based territorial development, and sustainable food systems. His academic background is in rural sociology, having completed a MSc. in International Rural Development in the Rural Sociology Group of Wageningen University (The Netherlands). Jordan is currently based in Rome, Italy.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.