As the ECHA maintain”that the available scientific evidence did not meet the criteria to classify glyphosate as a carcinogen, as a mutagen or as toxic for reproduction” we take a look at how closely European politics and industry work together on pesticide regulation – and what this means. […]
A national experts’ vote on the European Commission’s plan to grant a new 15-year lease to the herbicide glyphosate was cancelled today (Tuesday) as several countries raised concerns over cancer warnings by the World Health Organisation. […]
The methods by which the EU Commission approves pesticides without the full dataset were criticised in a Decision by the EU Ombusdman yesterday (Monday). This practice “appeared to constitute maladministration” according to Emily O Reilly. […]
The European Parliament voted to oppose the importation of three genetically modified (GM) soybeans into the European Union. This vote sets it against the EU Commission, which wants to authorise these GM soybeans for feed use. […]
How does one group of the world’s most reputable experts find that “the herbicide glyphosate is probably carcinogenic to humans”, while another group of the world’s most reputable experts finds that it is “unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans” – in the same year? […]
Worrying trends in how pesticide safety is measured have been uncovered by Pesticide Action Network Europe. […]
Evidence used by UK Government to back decision not to support neonicotinoid ban ‘scientifically weak’ […]
Plight of bees finally being taken seriously by European authorities? […]
10 years of success? […]
GMO research debate […]
EFSA causes concern […]
For GM animal research […]
New report raises further questions about European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) decision making
[…]
© 2019 Agricultural and Rural Convention