18 Member States Fight to Keep Pesticides in Ecological Focus Areas

 As part of CAP simplification, the European Commission is attempting to bring in some changes to greening. However a group of 18 Member States oppose three of the new, clear simple rules which happen to be stricter than the current rules. For these Member States, including Рbizarrely Р the soon to leave UK, simplification is only acceptable if its to do things like allow pesticides in ecological focus areas, or cause other environmental damage.


Following¬†the Agriculture and Fisheries Council on 10 October 2016, a joint statement was released by 18 member states expressing their “concerns regarding a proposal amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 related to greening”. The member states in question are Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom.

The European Commission (EC) proposed amendments to simplify greening provisions,. While many have been accepted by member states, some simplifications are being opposed by this group of 18. These are:

  1. The introduction of ban on using plant protection products on productive areas (land lying fallow, catch crops and nitrogen-fixing crops);
  2. The extension of minimum fallow period from 6 to 9 months and
  3. the introduction of obligatory 10-week period for catch crops.

Simplification is fine then, until the simpler rule happens to be stricter. Much of this terrain is familiar to ARC2020 readers from the first time a group of Member States watered down greening.

We worked on a campaign regarding EFAs and pesticides, while we have a dedicated section of this website devoted to the greening process, including EFAs. It is noteworthy that initially there were 23 Member States who spearheaded the move for pesticides into EFAs in 2013: Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Ireland, Spain, France, Croatia, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland and Sweden.

Below Ireland’s Fintan Kelly, Natural Environment Officer with An Taisce – The National Trust for Ireland – outlines his organisation’s opposition to Ireland’s signing of this letter.

Ireland is one of 18 member states who have moved to block a ban on pesticides in Ecological Focus Areas [1]. The move echoes the efforts in 2013 of the then Minister for Agriculture Simon Coveney to block a ban on pesticides within the EU linked to collapses in bee populations in Europe [2]. Despite the expensive marketing of Irish agriculture as a leader in sustainable food and drink production under Bord Bia’s Origin Green [3] initiative it is clear that Irish government remains as backward as ever when it comes to environmental issues.

Ecological Focus Areas were introduced as part of the ‚ÄėGreening’ of the EU‚Äôs Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) under the 2013 CAP reform [4]. The need to reduce the environmental impact of agriculture in Europe came with the recognition that the intensification of agriculture, which was driven in the main by EU policies and subsidies had seriously degraded the environment in Europe, driving biodiversity loss and water pollution [5, 6, 7]. The CAP has a budget of 58 billion Euro a year, which accounts for about 40% of the EU‚Äôs total budget [8]. Under ‚Äėgreening‚Äô it was agreed that 30% of EU countries’ direct payment budgets or 12 billion euro a year would be reserved for certain practices aimed at addressing biodiversity loss, avoiding crop monoculture and securing carbon sequestration [4].

One of the key proposals under greening was the introduction of Ecological Focus Areas (EFA’s) on large arable farms. The scale and intensity of fertiliser and pesticide use in the EUs arable farming sector had resulted in extensive biodiversity loss, water pollution and soil degradation in many parts of Europe [9]. To try to redress this Europe’s farmers were obliged under greening to dedicate a minimum of 5% of their arable spaces to EFAs. These EFA’s range from areas where land is left fallow, to landscape features such as hedgerows, trees, buffer strips, afforested and agro-forestry areas, and measures such as catch crops and winter green cover. The idea was that these areas would be free of intensive land use, free of pesticides and fertilisers so that there would be space for wildlife to live and for essential natural processes such as pollination, soil formation and water purification to take place. It was envisioned that these EFAs would form essential environmental infrastructure from the farm to the landscape level.

Unfortunately the ambition of the EFAs was critically undermined by the successful lobbying of agribusiness lobbyists who convinced agricultural ministers of 23 Member States (including Ireland) to send a letter to the Commission to allow the use of pesticides and fertilisers in EFAs [10]. The Commission caved under pressure and left the banning of pesticides in EFA’s to the discretion of the individual EU states. The Irish government not surprisingly did not ban the use of pesticides and fertilisers in EFA’s leaving us with the incomprehensible situation where billions of taxpayers’ money are being invested in farm level protected areas which can be sprayed with herbicides to kill all plant life and sprayed with pesticides that destroy all insect life.

Environmental groups such as An Taisce have been urging the European Commission to address this abhorrent situation and place an outright ban on inputs in EFA‚Äôs so that they can deliver the environmental benefits which EU citizens have paid for. The establishment of EFA‚Äôs which are capable of supporting life is the bare minimum that should be expected from a reform which promised a “greener and fairer‚ÄĚ CAP. In response the European Commission (EC) has put forward proposals to amend the greening provisions under CAP, including ban on the use of herbicides and pesticides in EFA‚Äôs. In response to this progressive move a delegation of 18 countries including Ireland have sent a joint statement to the European Commission ahead of an agriculture Council meeting on Monday calling on the amendment to be dropped [11].

Despite the rhetoric and the expensive Origin Green advertising it is clear that nothing has changed when it comes to the Irish governments attitude to the environment. Successive Irish Agricultural Ministers have cemented our position as one of the most toxic countries in the European Union when it comes to the environment. Ireland has consistently sought to undermine any move which would address the impact of pesticides on wildlife and reduce the environmental impact of arable farming in the EU. To be clear in 2015 ‚ā¨364,500,900.00 will be handed to Irish farmers for greening measures which the Irish government intends to render meaningless [12]. Large arable farmers will be handed taxpayers money based solely on the amount of land they own and thanks to the government they will be given millions of euros in environmental payments for strips of land that can be sprayed with chemicals so that they support no life. This is an insult to us all.

Contact: Fintan Kelly, Natural Environment Officer, An Taisce, The National Trust for Ireland fintan.kelly@antaisce.org


NEW: Background document from Commission on CAP Greening review June 2016 (added 14/10/2016)

All ARC2020 articles on CAP (incl greening and simplification)

Oliver Moore
About Oliver Moore 188 Articles
DR. Oliver Moore is the communications director and editor-in-chief with ARC2020. He has a PhD in the sociology of farming and food, where he specialised in organics and direct sales. He is published in the International Journal of Consumer Studies, International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology and the Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development. A weekly columnist and contributor with Irish Examiner, he is a regular on Countrywide (Irish farm radio show on the national broadcaster RTE 1) and engages in other communications work around agri-food and rural issues, such as with the soil, permaculture, climate change adaptation and citizen science initiative Grow Observatory . He lectures part time in the Centre for Co-operative Studies UCC ¬† ¬†                                                                   ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† Oliver voyage beaucoup moins qu‚Äôauparavant, pour ce qui concerne son activit√© professionnelle. Il peut n√©anmoins admirer par la fen√™tre de son bureau les m√©sanges charbonni√®res et les corbeaux perch√©s au sommet du saule dans le jardin de sa maison au cŇďur de l‚Äô√©covillage de Cloughjordan, en Irlande. L‚Äô√©covillage est un site de 67 acres dans le nord du Tipperary. Il comprend d‚Äôespaces bois√©s, des paysages comestibles, des lieux de vie, d‚Äôhabitation et de travail, ainsi qu‚Äôune ferme appartenant √† la communaut√©. Les jours o√Ļ il travaille dans le bureau du centre d‚Äôentreprise communautaire, il profite d‚Äôune vue sur les chevaux, les panneaux solaires, les toilettes s√®ches et les jardins familiaux.¬† Ce bureau au sein de l‚Äô√©covillage constitue en effet un tiers-lieu de travail accueillant √©galement des collaborateurs des associations Cultivate et Ecolise, ainsi qu‚Äôun laboratoire de fabrication (¬ę fab lab ¬Ľ).¬† Oliver est membre du conseil d‚Äôadministration de la ferme communautaire (pour la seconde fois !) et donne √©galement des cours sur le Master en coop√©ratives, agroalimentaire et d√©veloppement durable √† l‚ÄôUniversity College Cork. Il a une formation en sociologie rurale : son doctorat et les articles qu‚Äôil publie dans des journaux scientifiques portent sur ce domaine au sens large. Il consacre la majorit√© de son temps de travail √† l‚ÄôARC 2020. Il collabore avec ARC depuis 2013, date √† laquelle l‚ÄôIrlande a assur√© la pr√©sidence de l‚ÄôUE pendant six mois. C‚Äôest l√† qu‚Äôil a pu constater l‚Äôimportance de la politique agroalimentaire et rurale gr√Ęce √† sa chronique hebdomadaire sur le site d‚ÄôARC. Apr√®s six mois, il est nomm√© r√©dacteur en chef et responsable de la communication, poste qu‚Äôil occupe toujours aujourd‚Äôhui. Oliver supervise le contenu du site web et des m√©dias sociaux, aide √† d√©finir l‚Äôorientation de l‚Äôorganisation et parfois m√™me r√©dige un article pour le site web.¬† √Ä l‚Äô√©poque o√Ļ on voyageait davantage, il a eu la chance de passer du temps sous les tropiques, o√Ļ il a aid√© des ONG irlandaises de commerce √©quitable ‚Äď au Ghana, au Kenya, au Mali, en Inde et au Salvador ‚Äď √† raconter leur histoire.¬† Il se peut que ces jours-l√† reviennent. Pour son compte Oliver continuera de pr√©f√©rer naviguer en Europe par bateau, puis en train. Apr√®s tout, la France n‚Äôest qu‚Äô√† une nuit de navigation. En attendant, il y a toujours de nombreuses possibilit√©s de b√©n√©volat dans la communaut√© dans les campagnes du centre de l‚ÄôIrlande.