Cowpea and maize intercropped in a field under research for fall armyworm control. Photo: World Agroforestry/Chipo Chisonga
Patrick Worm’s sets his sights on the armyworm, and how to cope with it. Turns, out, providing patches of natural and semi-natural habitats around farms can attract some of the many critters that are the armyworm’s natural predator. Trees are a handy technique to better manage crop and, bonus, not poison people the water or the soil. Patrick Worm’s is the Senior Science Policy Advisor of World Agroforestry (ICRAF) and the President of the European Agroforestry Federation.
By Patrick Worms
You know, pesticides? They’re supposed to be essential to feeding the world?
Well, no. In the case of fall armyworm (a serious scourge for poor farmers), for example, they merely poison people, make money for poison peddlers – and kill all the beasties that love to munch on the worm. And the worm, you ask? It’s nice and snug, safe and sound, inside the top whorl of its host plant.
If instead of thinking that poisoning people, soils and water supplies to make your living is a great idea, and you actually want to help, you’ll notice that “over 150 parasitoid species and other natural predators — including spiders, beetles, ants, social wasps, insectivorous birds and bats — are known to attack fall armyworm. These natural enemies provide effective control of the pest in many situations. Patches of natural and semi-natural habitats around farms attract these diverse natural enemies that feed on fall armyworm at different stages of their life cycles. The application of highly toxic pesticides damages this natural pest-control service.”
We don’t get paid billions to poison the world and have to beg money from donors to help. But our help actually works. We help farmers plant multi-purpose trees around their fields. These don’t just attract those predators, but they also provide all sorts of other services and products.
The farmers using this solution are not poisoned, don’t lose their crops, have extra foods and products to sell, and are smiling a satisfied smile as they relax in the evening watching the sunset, a cold beer in their hand.
Patrick Worms trained as a molecular geneticist and is the Senior Science Policy Advisor of World Agroforestry (ICRAF) and the President of the European Agroforestry Federation.
The use of glyphosate has been curtailed in the Czech Republic with a new ban on desiccating crops for human consumption that came into effect on January 1, 2019. Grains and rapeseed are the main food crops affected by the new regulations. But the Ministry of Agriculture has been accused of making a U-turn on a blanket ban on glyphosate previously announced in September 2018. How far will the Czech Republic go in calling time’s up on Roundup? […]
Yesterday, Marta Zygadlo introduced us to Spanish coalition Por Otra PAC. Today we take a look at the coalitions’ priorities and how it plans to push food sovereignty and agroecological transition in Spain. What would an EU agrifood system based on the principles of solidarity, equity and democracy look like? […]
Guest opinion piece by Julia Sievers -of Agrarkoordination. This year, the EU will decide whether glyphosate – the best-selling pesticide worldwide – remains approved after 2015 for another 10 years. As a basis for this decision, German authorities – on behalf of the EU – have re-examined the risks of this pesticide. The German authorities argue in their assessment report that glyphosate is not dangerous and recommend a re-authorization. But the official assessment is extremely controversial. A fundamental problem is that the judgement of the authorities is based almost exclusively on studies of companies that produce their own glyphosate-based pesticides and therefore have a high self-interest in positive study results. In contrast to the assessment of the authorities and the industry studies, numerous studies of industry-independent scientists have give rise to more and more doubts about the safety of glyphosate and glyphosate-based pesticide. In addition to the adverse impacts on biodiversity, water, soil and some animal species, public attention has been paid to the health risks of the herbicide. There is scientific evidence, that Glyphosate causes cancer, […]
2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks
Comments are closed.