During the meeting of the European Council on 15th of December 2011, Ministers had an exchange of opinions about the proposed Regulation on the support to rural development from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). The debate focused on the actions planned to address the new challenges under the second pillar. In particular, most delegations noted that the contents of proposals cannot be properly evaluated without knowledge of the distribution of resources between Member States. Italian Minister Catania strongly supported the need for Italy to benefit, through resources of Pillar 2, from a sort of rebalancing that takes into account reductions applied to direct payments allocated to Italy. He also expressed concerns about the inclusion of the EAFRD in the Common Strategic Framework, as, in this way, rural development policy, which has to be considered as part of the CAP, could lose autonomy. He mentioned the need for simplification because having a very complex programming framework would be helpful to none. Concerning agri-environmental measures, he remarked the risk that they may be unattractive owing to new constraints requested by the introduction of greening. Moreover, with regard to irrigation investments, he stressed that the 25% reduction in water consumption is too restrictive and could prevent farmers from activating the relevant measure. Finally, he criticised the abolition of the measure on quality products for the next programming period.
EU and Irish context to upcoming event remain somewhat hostile to stated aims […]
An ARC report on reactions from Member States and MEPs at the joint debate on CAP reform held on 7th November (second of two parts) […]