TTIP in disarray as US Senate rejects fast track

photo: Campact via flickr.com (CC BY-NC 2.0)
photo: Campact via flickr.com (CC BY-NC 2.0)

TTIP – the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership – has been dealt a hammer blow by¬†a vote yesterday in the US Senate on another similar trade agreement. TPP – the Trans Pacific Partnership – was curtailed¬†as Democrats in the Senate voted against US president Obama’s plans to grant fast track authority for the legislation. The¬†Trade Promotion Authority ¬†(TPA, or fast track) bill fell short of the 60-vote hurdle, failing 52-45. Had it passed, both trade agreements could have proceeded without amendments.

This has implications for TTIP¬†because, as Karen Hansen Khun of Arc2020 sister organisation IATP told us¬†twitter late last night “While most of the attention is on TPP, Fast Track applies to TTIP too! Includes a big focus on ISDS.”

Karen TTIP

This Senate vote then, places a serious hurdle in the way of TTIP. Fast track was to be used in both TPP and TTIP: its rejection seriously hinders the progress of TTIP.

According to Alexander Bolton writing in The Hill¬†yesterday “The legislation faces even stronger opposition from Democrats in the House, and the surprise Senate failure could signal the beginning of the end for one of Obama‚Äôs top priorities.”

Likewise, the Guardian¬† adds “it is seen as highly unlikely that international diplomats can complete either of the two giant trade deals currently in negotiation: the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).”

Obama had formed a bipartisan alliance with Republicans on the issue, but underestimated opposition within the Democrats, spurred on by powerful campaigning by labour unions and the NGO/CSO sector in the US.

TPP is the Pacific rim version of TTIP, covering eleven countries from Vietnam to Australia but excluding China, who are negotiating a separate deal expected to conclude in 20205.

But is the legislation scuppered or just stymied? According to the New York Times, the vote “presented Mr. Obama what might be a no-win situation. He may have to accept trade enforcement provisions he does not want in order to propel the trade legislation through the Senate, but those same provisions might doom the Pacific trade negotiations that legislation is supposed to lift.”

All told, both TPP and TTIP have been severely curtailed by this vote. Importantly this shows how politicians can be swayed on both TPP and TTIP: in the US, there had been consensus at an earlier stage in the finance Committee.

And as¬†Doru Frantescu wrote in Euractiv, a similar process has happened in Europe too. Writing on the¬†likely TTIP voting patterns in the European Parliament for the June Plenary: “the balance of power may still change before the end of the negotiations and the ratification by the EP, if the ‚Äėagainst‚Äô camp becomes more successful in convincing and mobilising the public opinion, exactly as it happened in the case of ACTA (who initially had the support of a narrow majority in the EP, but in the end the tide turned overwhelmingly against it).”

It seems more likely now, following this Senate vote on TPP, that MEPs will start to take far more seriously the undeniable civil society momentum to scupper TTIP.

All Arc2020 articles in TTIP

 

Oliver Moore
About Oliver Moore 196 Articles
Dr. Oliver Moore is the communications director and editor-in-chief with ARC2020. He has a PhD in the sociology of farming and food, where he specialised in organics and direct sales. He is published in the International Journal of Consumer Studies, International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology and the Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development. A weekly columnist and contributor with Irish Examiner, he is a regular on Countrywide (Irish farm radio show on the national broadcaster RTE 1) and engages in other communications work around agri-food and rural issues, such as with the soil, permaculture, climate change adaptation and citizen science initiative Grow Observatory . He lectures part time in the Centre for Co-operative Studies UCC. ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† ¬† A propos d'Oliver Moore Oliver voyage beaucoup moins qu‚Äôauparavant, pour ce qui concerne son activit√© professionnelle. Il peut n√©anmoins admirer par la fen√™tre de son bureau les m√©sanges charbonni√®res et les corbeaux perch√©s au sommet du saule dans le jardin de sa maison au cŇďur de l‚Äô√©covillage de Cloughjordan, en Irlande. L‚Äô√©covillage est un site de 67 acres dans le nord du Tipperary. Il comprend d‚Äôespaces bois√©s, des paysages comestibles, des lieux de vie, d‚Äôhabitation et de travail, ainsi qu‚Äôune ferme appartenant √† la communaut√©. Les jours o√Ļ il travaille dans le bureau du centre d‚Äôentreprise communautaire, il profite d‚Äôune vue sur les chevaux, les panneaux solaires, les toilettes s√®ches et les jardins familiaux.¬† Ce bureau au sein de l‚Äô√©covillage constitue en effet un tiers-lieu de travail accueillant √©galement des collaborateurs des associations Cultivate et Ecolise, ainsi qu‚Äôun laboratoire de fabrication (¬ę fab lab ¬Ľ).¬† Oliver est membre du conseil d‚Äôadministration de la ferme communautaire (pour la seconde fois !) et donne √©galement des cours sur le Master en coop√©ratives, agroalimentaire et d√©veloppement durable √† l‚ÄôUniversity College Cork. Il a une formation en sociologie rurale : son doctorat et les articles qu‚Äôil publie dans des journaux scientifiques portent sur ce domaine au sens large. Il consacre la majorit√© de son temps de travail √† l‚ÄôARC 2020. Il collabore avec ARC depuis 2013, date √† laquelle l‚ÄôIrlande a assur√© la pr√©sidence de l‚ÄôUE pendant six mois. C‚Äôest l√† qu‚Äôil a pu constater l‚Äôimportance de la politique agroalimentaire et rurale gr√Ęce √† sa chronique hebdomadaire sur le site d‚ÄôARC. Apr√®s six mois, il est nomm√© r√©dacteur en chef et responsable de la communication, poste qu‚Äôil occupe toujours aujourd‚Äôhui. Oliver supervise le contenu du site web et des m√©dias sociaux, aide √† d√©finir l‚Äôorientation de l‚Äôorganisation et parfois m√™me r√©dige un article pour le site web.¬† √Ä l‚Äô√©poque o√Ļ on voyageait davantage, il a eu la chance de passer du temps sous les tropiques, o√Ļ il a aid√© des ONG irlandaises de commerce √©quitable ‚Äď au Ghana, au Kenya, au Mali, en Inde et au Salvador ‚Äď √† raconter leur histoire. Il se peut que ces jours-l√† reviennent. Pour son compte Oliver continuera de pr√©f√©rer naviguer en Europe par bateau, puis en train. Apr√®s tout, la France n‚Äôest qu‚Äô√† une nuit de navigation. En attendant, il y a toujours de nombreuses possibilit√©s de b√©n√©volat dans la communaut√© dans les campagnes du centre de l‚ÄôIrlande.