Hungarian response to CAP: how has the rhetoric changed?
Exploring the gap between the rhetoric and the reality in Hungary on CAP refrom […]
Exploring the gap between the rhetoric and the reality in Hungary on CAP refrom […]
Saving the Romanian countryside or meddling in another country’s affairs? Prince Charles generates highland subprogramme for Romania […]
Are the tobacco lobby still up to their mad old tricks? […]
(Brussels, 02/10/13) BEGINS On Monday the European Parliament’s Agriculture Committee (COMAGRI) voted on the remaining issues on CAP reform. This follows the substantive agreement in June in Ireland and the final trilogue between Parliament, Council and Commission last week, where the Council strong-armed the Parliament into ceding its position, aided by the Commission. The committee vote still needs to be confirmed by Parliament as a whole in a plenary vote at the November session. “The co-decision procedure on CAP reform has been a long, epic process, full of delays and brinkmanship. In the end however, it also represents, unfortunately, a missed opportunity to really, radically reform the CAP. The momentum now turns to member states” Samuel Feret, ARC2020’s coordinator said. Substantial reform has been bypassed in favour of business as usual, questioning the whole notion of co-decision making and trilogue. The Council, together with anti-reform COMAGRI members opposed capping payments to even the wealthiest, while watering down greening with exemptions and loopholes and maintaining polluting and export dumping practices. Specifically The COMAGRI vote dealt with outstanding issues on DP (Direct Payments), CMO (Common Organisation of Markets), RD (Rural Development) and HZR (Horizontal Regulations). […]
After initial positive soundings, is France now getting scared of genuine CAP reform? […]
With milk quota due to end in 2015, how is Europe preparing? […]
Mixed feelings emerge, as the new Common Agricultural Policy waits for its final vote. […]
Parliament rubber stamps legislation bad for citizens, rural areas and the environment, but battle continues. […]
How was the reaction in Scotland to the recent CAP reform triloge and parliament vote? […]
Trilogue turns out to be a Council monologue in disappointing result for citizens. […]
There is much to be campaigned for in the weeks ahead for CAP implementation at the regional/national level. This new toolkit explains what, why, and how. […]
The European Parliament (EP) voted Wednesday to include what is called Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) considerations in its biofuels targets. What effect will this have on the EU’s renewable energy, climate change and also on land use? This European Parliament vote means that the real climate impact, due to displacement of food production, will be taken into account in the EU’s biofuel targets and policies. A cap of 6% on land-based biofuels, including energy crops, has been adopted. According to Terhi Lehtonen environment advisor Greens/EFA group: “This would be the minimum necessary to take real measures to tackle the climate, food security and other social impacts due to displacement of food production that is caused by EU biofuels policy.” Lehtonen adds: “The EP vote also signalled to the markets that future investments should be on biofuels with low-ILUC risk and no food based fuels should be supported after 2020.” How did the vote go? See votewatch here Background Biofuels are liquid fuels made mostly from crops which can be mixed with fossil fuels to […]
Stéphane Le Foll has expressed his preference for the most redistributive option […]
Arc2020 joined forces with 7 other environmental organizations to issue an open letter at a crucial time in the remaining CAP negotiations […]
UK committed to applying an “active farmer” test to ensure SPS payments in future […]
Agricultural and Rural Convention
You are currently viewing a placeholder content from amChart. To access the actual content, click the button below. Please note that doing so will share data with third-party providers.
More Information